This is a follow-up to
52d0e95bf.
It is not necessary to set PL_expect (via TERM or OPERATOR) since
tokenize_use has already done it. In
52d0e95bf I only changed one of
tokenize_use’s callers, and changed it the wrong way.
No behaviour changes.
case KEY_no:
s = tokenize_use(0, s);
- TERM(USE);
+ TOKEN(USE);
case KEY_not:
if (*s == '(' || (s = SKIPSPACE1(s), *s == '('))
case KEY_use:
s = tokenize_use(1, s);
- OPERATOR(USE);
+ TOKEN(USE);
case KEY_values:
UNI(OP_VALUES);