+EOCBU
+
+$cat > UU/use64bitall.cbu <<'EOCBU'
+# This script UU/use64bitall.cbu will get 'called-back' by Configure
+# after it has prompted the user for whether to be maximally 64 bitty.
+
+case "$use64bitall" in
+$define|true|[yY]*)
+ case "$cc" in
+ *-n32*|*-32*)
+ cat >&4 <<EOM
+You cannot use a non-64 bit cc for -Duse64bitall, sorry.
+Cannot continue, aborting.
+EOM
+ exit 1
+ ;;
+ esac
+ ;;
+esac
+
+EOCBU
+
+$cat > UU/uselongdouble.cbu <<'EOCBU'
+# This script UU/uselongdouble.cbu will get 'called-back' by Configure
+# after it has prompted the user for whether to use long doubles.
+
+# This script is designed to test IRIX (and other machines, once it's put into
+# Configure) for a bug in which they fail to round correctly when using
+# sprintf/printf/etcetera on a long double with precision specified (%.0Lf or
+# whatever). Sometimes, this only happens when the number in question is
+# between 1 and -1, weirdly enough. - Allen
+
+case "$uselongdouble" in
+$define|true|[yY]*)
+
+case "$d_PRIfldbl" in
+$define|true|[yY]*)
+
+ echo " " >try.c
+ $cat >>try.c <<EOP
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#define sPRIfldbl $sPRIfldbl
+
+#define I_STDLIB $i_stdlib
+#ifdef I_STDLIB
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#endif
+
+int main()
+{
+ char buf1[64];
+ char buf2[64];
+ buf1[63] = '\0';
+ buf2[63] = '\0';
+
+ (void)sprintf(buf1,"%.0"sPRIfldbl,(long double)0.6L);
+ (void)sprintf(buf2,"%.0f",(double)0.6);
+ if (strcmp(buf1,buf2)) {
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ (void)sprintf(buf1,"%.0"sPRIfldbl,(long double)-0.6L);
+ (void)sprintf(buf2,"%.0f",(double)-0.6);
+ if (strcmp(buf1,buf2)) {
+ exit(1);
+ } else {
+ exit(0);
+ }
+}
+
+EOP
+
+ set try
+ if eval $compile && $run ./try; then
+ rm -f try try.* >/dev/null
+ else
+ rm -f try try.* core a.out >/dev/null
+ ccflags="$ccflags -DHAS_LDBL_SPRINTF_BUG"
+ cppflags="$cppflags -DHAS_LDBL_SPRINTF_BUG"
+
+ echo " " >try.c
+ $cat >>try.c <<EOP
+#include <stdio.h>
+
+#define sPRIfldbl $sPRIfldbl
+
+#define I_STDLIB $i_stdlib
+#ifdef I_STDLIB
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#endif
+
+int main()
+{
+ char buf1[64];
+ char buf2[64];
+ buf1[63] = '\0';
+ buf2[63] = '\0';
+
+ (void)sprintf(buf1,"%.0"sPRIfldbl,(long double)1.6L);
+ (void)sprintf(buf2,"%.0f",(double)1.6);
+ if (strcmp(buf1,buf2)) {
+ exit(1);
+ }
+ (void)sprintf(buf1,"%.0"sPRIfldbl,(long double)-1.6L);
+ (void)sprintf(buf2,"%.0f",(double)-1.6);
+ if (strcmp(buf1,buf2)) {
+ exit(1);
+ } else {
+ exit(0);
+ }
+}
+
+EOP
+
+ set try
+ if eval $compile && $run ./try; then
+ rm -f try try.c >/dev/null
+ ccflags="$ccflags -DHAS_LDBL_SPRINTF_BUG_LESS1"
+ cppflags="$cppflags -DHAS_LDBL_SPRINTF_BUG_LESS1"
+ else
+ rm -f try try.c core try.o a.out >/dev/null
+ fi
+ fi
+;;
+*) # Can't tell!
+ ccflags="$ccflags -DHAS_LDBL_SPRINTF_BUG"
+ cppflags="$cppflags -DHAS_LDBL_SPRINTF_BUG"
+ ;;
+esac
+
+# end of case statement for how to print ldbl with 'f'
+;;
+*) ;;
+esac
+
+# end of case statement for whether to do long doubles
+
+EOCBU
+