would like is to be able to specify a Perl subroutine that will be
called instead.
-=item * An Event Driven Program
+=item * An Event-Driven Program
The classic example of where callbacks are used is when writing an
-event driven program like for an X windows application. In this case
+event driven program, such as for an X11 application. In this case
you register functions to be called whenever specific events occur,
e.g., a mouse button is pressed, the cursor moves into a window or a
menu item is selected.
L<perlembed>.
Before you launch yourself head first into the rest of this document,
-it would be a good idea to have read the following two documents -
-
L<perlxs> and L<perlguts>.
+it would be a good idea to have read the following two documents--L<perlxs>
+and L<perlguts>.
=head1 THE CALL_ FUNCTIONS
Perl has a number of C functions that allow you to call Perl
subroutines. They are
- I32 call_sv(SV* sv, I32 flags) ;
- I32 call_pv(char *subname, I32 flags) ;
- I32 call_method(char *methname, I32 flags) ;
- I32 call_argv(char *subname, I32 flags, register char **argv) ;
+ I32 call_sv(SV* sv, I32 flags);
+ I32 call_pv(char *subname, I32 flags);
+ I32 call_method(char *methname, I32 flags);
+ I32 call_argv(char *subname, I32 flags, char **argv);
The key function is I<call_sv>. All the other functions are
fairly simple wrappers which make it easier to call Perl subroutines in
=item call_sv
-I<call_sv> takes two parameters, the first, C<sv>, is an SV*.
+I<call_sv> takes two parameters. The first, C<sv>, is an SV*.
This allows you to specify the Perl subroutine to be called either as a
C string (which has first been converted to an SV) or a reference to a
subroutine. The section, I<Using call_sv>, shows how you can make
I<call_argv> calls the Perl subroutine specified by the C string
stored in the C<subname> parameter. It also takes the usual C<flags>
-parameter. The final parameter, C<argv>, consists of a NULL terminated
+parameter. The final parameter, C<argv>, consists of a NULL-terminated
list of C strings to be passed as parameters to the Perl subroutine.
See I<Using call_argv>.
=head1 FLAG VALUES
-The C<flags> parameter in all the I<call_*> functions is a bit mask
-which can consist of any combination of the symbols defined below,
-OR'ed together.
-
+The C<flags> parameter in all the I<call_*> functions is one of G_VOID,
+G_SCALAR, or G_ARRAY, which indicate the call context, OR'ed together
+with a bit mask of any combination of the other G_* symbols defined below.
=head2 G_VOID
=back
The value returned by the I<call_*> function indicates how many
-items have been returned by the Perl subroutine - in this case it will
+items have been returned by the Perl subroutine--in this case it will
be 0.
It indicates to the subroutine being called that it is executing in a
list context (if it executes I<wantarray> the result will be true).
-
=item 2.
It ensures that all items returned from the subroutine will be
Although the functionality provided by this flag may seem
straightforward, it should be used only if there is a good reason to do
-so. The reason for being cautious is that even if you have specified
+so. The reason for being cautious is that, even if you have specified
the G_NOARGS flag, it is still possible for the Perl subroutine that
has been called to think that you have passed it parameters.
sub joe
{ &fred }
- &joe(1,2,3) ;
+ &joe(1,2,3);
This will print
=head2 G_KEEPERR
-You may have noticed that using the G_EVAL flag described above will
-B<always> clear the C<$@> variable and set it to a string describing
-the error iff there was an error in the called code. This unqualified
-resetting of C<$@> can be problematic in the reliable identification of
-errors using the C<eval {}> mechanism, because the possibility exists
-that perl will call other code (end of block processing code, for
-example) between the time the error causes C<$@> to be set within
-C<eval {}>, and the subsequent statement which checks for the value of
-C<$@> gets executed in the user's script.
-
-This scenario will mostly be applicable to code that is meant to be
-called from within destructors, asynchronous callbacks, signal
-handlers, C<__DIE__> or C<__WARN__> hooks, and C<tie> functions. In
-such situations, you will not want to clear C<$@> at all, but simply to
-append any new errors to any existing value of C<$@>.
+Using the G_EVAL flag described above will always set C<$@>: clearing
+it if there was no error, and setting it to describe the error if there
+was an error in the called code. This is what you want if your intention
+is to handle possible errors, but sometimes you just want to trap errors
+and stop them interfering with the rest of the program.
+
+This scenario will mostly be applicable to code that is meant to be called
+from within destructors, asynchronous callbacks, and signal handlers.
+In such situations, where the code being called has little relation to the
+surrounding dynamic context, the main program needs to be insulated from
+errors in the called code, even if they can't be handled intelligently.
+It may also be useful to do this with code for C<__DIE__> or C<__WARN__>
+hooks, and C<tie> functions.
The G_KEEPERR flag is meant to be used in conjunction with G_EVAL in
-I<call_*> functions that are used to implement such code. This flag
-has no effect when G_EVAL is not used.
+I<call_*> functions that are used to implement such code, or with
+C<eval_sv>. This flag has no effect on the C<call_*> functions when
+G_EVAL is not used.
-When G_KEEPERR is used, any errors in the called code will be prefixed
-with the string "\t(in cleanup)", and appended to the current value
-of C<$@>. an error will not be appended if that same error string is
-already at the end of C<$@>.
+When G_KEEPERR is used, any error in the called code will terminate the
+call as usual, and the error will not propagate beyond the call (as usual
+for G_EVAL), but it will not go into C<$@>. Instead the error will be
+converted into a warning, prefixed with the string "\t(in cleanup)".
+This can be disabled using C<no warnings 'misc'>. If there is no error,
+C<$@> will not be cleared.
-In addition, a warning is generated using the appended string. This can be
-disabled using C<no warnings 'misc'>.
+Note that the G_KEEPERR flag does not propagate into inner evals; these
+may still set C<$@>.
The G_KEEPERR flag was introduced in Perl version 5.002.
executing subroutine in Perl with I<wantarray>. The equivalent test
can be made in C by using the C<GIMME_V> macro, which returns
C<G_ARRAY> if you have been called in a list context, C<G_SCALAR> if
-in a scalar context, or C<G_VOID> if in a void context (i.e. the
+in a scalar context, or C<G_VOID> if in a void context (i.e., the
return value will not be used). An older version of this macro is
called C<GIMME>; in a void context it returns C<G_SCALAR> instead of
C<G_VOID>. An example of using the C<GIMME_V> macro is shown in
=head1 EXAMPLES
-Enough of the definition talk, let's have a few examples.
+Enough of the definition talk! Let's have a few examples.
Perl provides many macros to assist in accessing the Perl stack.
Wherever possible, these macros should always be used when interfacing
I<call_sv>, you should always try to use I<call_sv>. See
I<Using call_sv> for details.
-=head2 No Parameters, Nothing returned
+=head2 No Parameters, Nothing Returned
This first trivial example will call a Perl subroutine, I<PrintUID>, to
print out the UID of the process.
sub PrintUID
{
- print "UID is $<\n" ;
+ print "UID is $<\n";
}
and here is a C function to call it
static void
call_PrintUID()
{
- dSP ;
+ dSP;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
- call_pv("PrintUID", G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
+ call_pv("PrintUID", G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
}
-Simple, eh.
+Simple, eh?
-A few points to note about this example.
+A few points to note about this example:
=over 5
string ($s) and an integer ($n). The subroutine will simply
print the first $n characters of the string.
-So the Perl subroutine would look like this
+So the Perl subroutine would look like this:
sub LeftString
{
- my($s, $n) = @_ ;
- print substr($s, 0, $n), "\n" ;
+ my($s, $n) = @_;
+ print substr($s, 0, $n), "\n";
}
-The C function required to call I<LeftString> would look like this.
+The C function required to call I<LeftString> would look like this:
static void
call_LeftString(a, b)
- char * a ;
- int b ;
+ char * a;
+ int b;
{
- dSP ;
+ dSP;
- ENTER ;
- SAVETMPS ;
+ ENTER;
+ SAVETMPS;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(a, 0)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUTBACK;
call_pv("LeftString", G_DISCARD);
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
}
Here are a few notes on the C function I<call_LeftString>.
The C<PUSHMARK> macro tells Perl to make a mental note of the current
stack pointer. Even if you aren't passing any parameters (like the
-example shown in the section I<No Parameters, Nothing returned>) you
+example shown in the section I<No Parameters, Nothing Returned>) you
must still call the C<PUSHMARK> macro before you can call any of the
I<call_*> functions--Perl still needs to know that there are no
parameters.
The C<PUTBACK> macro sets the global copy of the stack pointer to be
-the same as our local copy. If we didn't do this I<call_pv>
+the same as our local copy. If we didn't do this, I<call_pv>
wouldn't know where the two parameters we pushed were--remember that
up to now all the stack pointer manipulation we have done is with our
local copy, I<not> the global copy.
This is the purpose of
- ENTER ;
- SAVETMPS ;
+ ENTER;
+ SAVETMPS;
at the start of the function, and
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
at the end. The C<ENTER>/C<SAVETMPS> pair creates a boundary for any
temporaries we create. This means that the temporaries we get rid of
mortal SVs we have created. Having C<ENTER>/C<SAVETMPS> at the
beginning of the code makes sure that no other mortals are destroyed.
-Think of these macros as working a bit like using C<{> and C<}> in Perl
+Think of these macros as working a bit like C<{> and C<}> in Perl
to limit the scope of local variables.
-See the section I<Using Perl to dispose of temporaries> for details of
+See the section I<Using Perl to Dispose of Temporaries> for details of
an alternative to using these macros.
=item 6.
sub Adder
{
- my($a, $b) = @_ ;
- $a + $b ;
+ my($a, $b) = @_;
+ $a + $b;
}
Because we are now concerned with the return value from I<Adder>, the C
static void
call_Adder(a, b)
- int a ;
- int b ;
+ int a;
+ int b;
{
- dSP ;
- int count ;
+ dSP;
+ int count;
- ENTER ;
+ ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("Adder", G_SCALAR);
- SPAGAIN ;
+ SPAGAIN;
if (count != 1)
- croak("Big trouble\n") ;
+ croak("Big trouble\n");
- printf ("The sum of %d and %d is %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
+ printf ("The sum of %d and %d is %d\n", a, b, POPi);
- PUTBACK ;
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ PUTBACK;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
}
Points to note this time are
=item 1.
-The only flag specified this time was G_SCALAR. That means the C<@_>
+The only flag specified this time was G_SCALAR. That means that the C<@_>
array will be created and that the value returned by I<Adder> will
still exist after the call to I<call_pv>.
The purpose of the macro C<SPAGAIN> is to refresh the local copy of the
stack pointer. This is necessary because it is possible that the memory
-allocated to the Perl stack has been reallocated whilst in the
+allocated to the Perl stack has been reallocated during the
I<call_pv> call.
If you are making use of the Perl stack pointer in your code you must
=back
-=head2 Returning a list of values
+=head2 Returning a List of Values
Now, let's extend the previous example to return both the sum of the
parameters and the difference.
sub AddSubtract
{
- my($a, $b) = @_ ;
- ($a+$b, $a-$b) ;
+ my($a, $b) = @_;
+ ($a+$b, $a-$b);
}
and this is the C function
static void
call_AddSubtract(a, b)
- int a ;
- int b ;
+ int a;
+ int b;
{
- dSP ;
- int count ;
+ dSP;
+ int count;
- ENTER ;
+ ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("AddSubtract", G_ARRAY);
- SPAGAIN ;
+ SPAGAIN;
if (count != 2)
- croak("Big trouble\n") ;
+ croak("Big trouble\n");
- printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
- printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
+ printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi);
+ printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi);
- PUTBACK ;
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ PUTBACK;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
}
If I<call_AddSubtract> is called like this
- call_AddSubtract(7, 4) ;
+ call_AddSubtract(7, 4);
then here is the output
=back
-=head2 Returning a list in a scalar context
+=head2 Returning a List in a Scalar Context
Say the Perl subroutine in the previous section was called in a scalar
context, like this
static void
call_AddSubScalar(a, b)
- int a ;
- int b ;
+ int a;
+ int b;
{
- dSP ;
- int count ;
- int i ;
+ dSP;
+ int count;
+ int i;
- ENTER ;
+ ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("AddSubtract", G_SCALAR);
- SPAGAIN ;
+ SPAGAIN;
- printf ("Items Returned = %d\n", count) ;
+ printf ("Items Returned = %d\n", count);
- for (i = 1 ; i <= count ; ++i)
- printf ("Value %d = %d\n", i, POPi) ;
+ for (i = 1; i <= count; ++i)
+ printf ("Value %d = %d\n", i, POPi);
- PUTBACK ;
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ PUTBACK;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
}
The other modification made is that I<call_AddSubScalar> will print the
simplicity it assumes that they are integer). So if
I<call_AddSubScalar> is called
- call_AddSubScalar(7, 4) ;
+ call_AddSubScalar(7, 4);
then the output will be
Value 1 = 3
In this case the main point to note is that only the last item in the
-list is returned from the subroutine
, I<AddSubtract> actually made it back to
+list is returned from the subroutine
. I<AddSubtract> actually made it back to
I<call_AddSubScalar>.
-=head2 Returning Data from Perl via the parameter list
+=head2 Returning Data from Perl via the Parameter List
-It is also possible to return values directly via the parameter list -
-whether it is actually desirable to do it is another matter entirely.
+It is also possible to return values directly via the parameter
+list--whether it is actually desirable to do it is another matter entirely.
The Perl subroutine, I<Inc>, below takes 2 parameters and increments
each directly.
sub Inc
{
- ++ $_[0] ;
- ++ $_[1] ;
+ ++ $_[0];
+ ++ $_[1];
}
and here is a C function to call it.
static void
call_Inc(a, b)
- int a ;
- int b ;
+ int a;
+ int b;
{
- dSP ;
- int count ;
- SV * sva ;
- SV * svb ;
+ dSP;
+ int count;
+ SV * sva;
+ SV * svb;
- ENTER ;
+ ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
- sva = sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)) ;
- svb = sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)) ;
+ sva = sv_2mortal(newSViv(a));
+ svb = sv_2mortal(newSViv(b));
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sva);
XPUSHs(svb);
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("Inc", G_DISCARD);
if (count != 0)
croak ("call_Inc: expected 0 values from 'Inc', got %d\n",
- count) ;
+ count);
- printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", a, SvIV(sva)) ;
- printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", b, SvIV(svb)) ;
+ printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", a, SvIV(sva));
+ printf ("%d + 1 = %d\n", b, SvIV(svb));
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
}
To be able to access the two parameters that were pushed onto the stack
sub Subtract
{
- my ($a, $b) = @_ ;
+ my ($a, $b) = @_;
- die "death can be fatal\n" if $a < $b ;
+ die "death can be fatal\n" if $a < $b;
- $a - $b ;
+ $a - $b;
}
and some C to call it
static void
call_Subtract(a, b)
- int a ;
- int b ;
+ int a;
+ int b;
{
- dSP ;
- int count ;
+ dSP;
+ int count;
- ENTER ;
+ ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("Subtract", G_EVAL|G_SCALAR);
- SPAGAIN ;
+ SPAGAIN;
/* Check the eval first */
if (SvTRUE(ERRSV))
{
- STRLEN n_a;
- printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV(ERRSV, n_a)) ;
- POPs ;
+ printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV_nolen(ERRSV));
+ POPs;
}
else
{
if (count != 1)
croak("call_Subtract: wanted 1 value from 'Subtract', got %d\n",
- count) ;
+ count);
- printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi) ;
+ printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, POPi);
}
- PUTBACK ;
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ PUTBACK;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
}
If I<call_Subtract> is called thus
if (SvTRUE(ERRSV))
{
- STRLEN n_a;
- printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV(ERRSV, n_a)) ;
- POPs ;
+ printf ("Uh oh - %s\n", SvPV_nolen(ERRSV));
+ POPs;
}
is the direct equivalent of this bit of Perl
- print "Uh oh - $@\n" if $@ ;
+ print "Uh oh - $@\n" if $@;
C<PL_errgv> is a perl global of type C<GV *> that points to the
symbol table entry containing the error. C<ERRSV> therefore
I<call_*> function invoked with G_EVAL|G_SCALAR returns an error,
the top of the stack holds the value I<undef>. Because we want the
program to continue after detecting this error, it is essential that
-the stack is tidied up by removing the I<undef>.
+the stack be tidied up by removing the I<undef>.
=back
sub new { bless {}, $_[0] }
sub Subtract {
my($a,$b) = @_;
- die "death can be fatal" if $a < $b ;
+ die "death can be fatal" if $a < $b;
$a - $b;
}
sub DESTROY { call_Subtract(5, 4); }
sub foo { die "foo dies"; }
package main;
- eval { Foo->new->foo };
+ {
+ my $foo = Foo->new;
+ eval { $foo->foo };
+ }
print "Saw: $@" if $@; # should be, but isn't
This example will fail to recognize that an error occurred inside the
C<eval {}>. Here's why: the call_Subtract code got executed while perl
-was cleaning up temporaries when exiting the eval block, and because
+was cleaning up temporaries when exiting the outer braced block, and because
call_Subtract is implemented with I<call_pv> using the G_EVAL
flag, it promptly reset C<$@>. This results in the failure of the
outermost test for C<$@>, and thereby the failure of the error trap.
sub fred
{
- print "Hello there\n" ;
+ print "Hello there\n";
}
- CallSubPV("fred") ;
+ CallSubPV("fred");
Here is a snippet of XSUB which defines I<CallSubPV>.
CallSubPV(name)
char * name
CODE:
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
- call_pv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
+ call_pv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
That is fine as far as it goes. The thing is, the Perl subroutine
-can be specified as only a string. For Perl 4 this was adequate,
-but Perl 5 allows references to subroutines and anonymous subroutines.
+can be specified as only a string, however, Perl allows references
+to subroutines and anonymous subroutines.
This is where I<call_sv> is useful.
The code below for I<CallSubSV> is identical to I<CallSubPV> except
CallSubSV(name)
SV * name
CODE:
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
- call_sv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
+ call_sv(name, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
-Because we are using an SV to call I<fred> the following can all be used
+Because we are using an SV to call I<fred> the following can all be used:
- CallSubSV("fred") ;
- CallSubSV(\&fred) ;
- $ref = \&fred ;
- CallSubSV($ref) ;
- CallSubSV( sub { print "Hello there\n" } ) ;
+ CallSubSV("fred");
+ CallSubSV(\&fred);
+ $ref = \&fred;
+ CallSubSV($ref);
+ CallSubSV( sub { print "Hello there\n" } );
As you can see, I<call_sv> gives you much greater flexibility in
how you can specify the Perl subroutine.
-You should note that if it is necessary to store the SV (C<name> in the
+You should note that, if it is necessary to store the SV (C<name> in the
example above) which corresponds to the Perl subroutine so that it can
be used later in the program, it not enough just to store a copy of the
-pointer to the SV. Say the code above had been like this
+pointer to the SV. Say the code above had been like this:
- static SV * rememberSub ;
+ static SV * rememberSub;
void
SaveSub1(name)
SV * name
CODE:
- rememberSub = name ;
+ rememberSub = name;
void
CallSavedSub1()
CODE:
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
- call_sv(rememberSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
+ call_sv(rememberSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
-The reason this is wrong is that by the time you come to use the
+The reason this is wrong is that, by the time you come to use the
pointer C<rememberSub> in C<CallSavedSub1>, it may or may not still refer
to the Perl subroutine that was recorded in C<SaveSub1>. This is
-particularly true for these cases
+particularly true for these cases:
- SaveSub1(\&fred) ;
- CallSavedSub1() ;
+ SaveSub1(\&fred);
+ CallSavedSub1();
- SaveSub1( sub { print "Hello there\n" } ) ;
- CallSavedSub1() ;
+ SaveSub1( sub { print "Hello there\n" } );
+ CallSavedSub1();
-By the time each of the C<SaveSub1> statements above have been executed,
+By the time each of the C<SaveSub1> statements above has been executed,
the SV*s which corresponded to the parameters will no longer exist.
Expect an error message from Perl of the form
Similarly, with this code
- $ref = \&fred ;
- SaveSub1($ref) ;
- $ref = 47 ;
- CallSavedSub1() ;
+ $ref = \&fred;
+ SaveSub1($ref);
+ $ref = 47;
+ CallSavedSub1();
you can expect one of these messages (which you actually get is dependent on
the version of Perl you are using)
though, it now refers to the integer C<47>, so expect Perl to complain
loudly.
-A similar but more subtle problem is illustrated with this code
+A similar but more subtle problem is illustrated with this code:
- $ref = \&fred ;
- SaveSub1($ref) ;
- $ref = \&joe ;
- CallSavedSub1() ;
+ $ref = \&fred;
+ SaveSub1($ref);
+ $ref = \&joe;
+ CallSavedSub1();
-This time whenever C<CallSavedSub1> get called it will execute the Perl
+This time whenever C<CallSavedSub1> gets called it will execute the Perl
subroutine C<joe> (assuming it exists) rather than C<fred> as was
originally requested in the call to C<SaveSub1>.
To get around these problems it is necessary to take a full copy of the
-SV. The code below shows C<SaveSub2> modified to do that
+SV. The code below shows C<SaveSub2> modified to do that.
- static SV * keepSub = (SV*)NULL ;
+ static SV * keepSub = (SV*)NULL;
void
SaveSub2(name)
/* Take a copy of the callback */
if (keepSub == (SV*)NULL)
/* First time, so create a new SV */
- keepSub = newSVsv(name) ;
+ keepSub = newSVsv(name);
else
/* Been here before, so overwrite */
- SvSetSV(keepSub, name) ;
+ SvSetSV(keepSub, name);
void
CallSavedSub2()
CODE:
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
- call_sv(keepSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
+ call_sv(keepSub, G_DISCARD|G_NOARGS);
To avoid creating a new SV every time C<SaveSub2> is called,
the function first checks to see if it has been called before. If not,
then space for a new SV is allocated and the reference to the Perl
-subroutine, C<name> is copied to the variable C<keepSub> in one
-operation using C<newSVsv>. Thereafter, whenever C<SaveSub2> is called
+subroutine C<name> is copied to the variable C<keepSub> in one
+operation using C<newSVsv>. Thereafter, whenever C<SaveSub2> is called,
the existing SV, C<keepSub>, is overwritten with the new value using
C<SvSetSV>.
sub PrintList
{
- my(@list) = @_ ;
+ my(@list) = @_;
foreach (@list) { print "$_\n" }
}
-and here is an example of I<call_argv> which will call
+And here is an example of I<call_argv> which will call
I<PrintList>.
- static char * words[] = {"alpha", "beta", "gamma", "delta", NULL} ;
+ static char * words[] = {"alpha", "beta", "gamma", "delta", NULL};
static void
call_PrintList()
{
- dSP ;
+ dSP;
- call_argv("PrintList", G_DISCARD, words) ;
+ call_argv("PrintList", G_DISCARD, words);
}
Note that it is not necessary to call C<PUSHMARK> in this instance.
=head2 Using call_method
-Consider the following Perl code
+Consider the following Perl code:
{
- package Mine ;
+ package Mine;
sub new
{
- my($type) = shift ;
+ my($type) = shift;
bless [@_]
}
sub Display
{
- my ($self, $index) = @_ ;
- print "$index: $$self[$index]\n" ;
+ my ($self, $index) = @_;
+ print "$index: $$self[$index]\n";
}
sub PrintID
{
- my($class) = @_ ;
- print "This is Class $class version 1.0\n" ;
+ my($class) = @_;
+ print "This is Class $class version 1.0\n";
}
}
the constructor, C<new>, it declares methods, one static and one
virtual. The static method, C<PrintID>, prints out simply the class
name and a version number. The virtual method, C<Display>, prints out a
-single element of the array. Here is an all Perl example of using it.
+single element of the array. Here is an all-Perl example of using it.
- $a = new Mine ('red', 'green', 'blue') ;
- $a->Display(1) ;
- PrintID Mine;
+ $a = Mine->new('red', 'green', 'blue');
+ $a->Display(1);
+ Mine->PrintID;
will print
This is Class Mine version 1.0
Calling a Perl method from C is fairly straightforward. The following
-things are required
+things are required:
=over 5
=item *
-a reference to the object for a virtual method or the name of the class
-for a static method.
+A reference to the object for a virtual method or the name of the class
+for a static method
=item *
-the name of the method.
+The name of the method
=item *
-any other parameters specific to the method.
+Any other parameters specific to the method
=back
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(ref);
- XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(index))) ;
+ XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(index)));
PUTBACK;
- call_method(method, G_DISCARD) ;
+ call_method(method, G_DISCARD);
void
call_PrintID(class, method)
char * method
CODE:
PUSHMARK(SP);
- XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(class, 0))) ;
+ XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(class, 0)));
PUTBACK;
- call_method(method, G_DISCARD) ;
+ call_method(method, G_DISCARD);
-So the methods C<PrintID> and C<Display> can be invoked like this
+So the methods C<PrintID> and C<Display> can be invoked like this:
- $a = new Mine ('red', 'green', 'blue') ;
- call_Method($a, 'Display', 1) ;
- call_PrintID('Mine', 'PrintID') ;
+ $a = Mine->new('red', 'green', 'blue');
+ call_Method($a, 'Display', 1);
+ call_PrintID('Mine', 'PrintID');
-The only thing to note is that in both the static and virtual methods,
+The only thing to note is that, in both the static and virtual methods,
the method name is not passed via the stack--it is used as the first
parameter to I<call_method>.
CODE:
I32 gimme = GIMME_V;
if (gimme == G_VOID)
- printf ("Context is Void\n") ;
+ printf ("Context is Void\n");
else if (gimme == G_SCALAR)
- printf ("Context is Scalar\n") ;
+ printf ("Context is Scalar\n");
else
- printf ("Context is Array\n") ;
+ printf ("Context is Array\n");
-and here is some Perl to test it
+And here is some Perl to test it.
- PrintContext ;
- $a = PrintContext ;
- @a = PrintContext ;
+ PrintContext;
+ $a = PrintContext;
+ @a = PrintContext;
The output from that will be
Context is Scalar
Context is Array
-=head2 Using Perl to dispose of temporaries
+=head2 Using Perl to Dispose of Temporaries
In the examples given to date, any temporaries created in the callback
(i.e., parameters passed on the stack to the I<call_*> function or
-values returned via the stack) have been freed by one of these methods
+values returned via the stack) have been freed by one of these methods:
=over 5
=item *
-specifying the G_DISCARD flag with I<call_*>.
+Specifying the G_DISCARD flag with I<call_*>
=item *
-explicitly disposed of using the C<ENTER>/C<SAVETMPS> -
-C<FREETMPS>/C<LEAVE> pairing.
+Explicitly using the C<ENTER>/C<SAVETMPS>--C<FREETMPS>/C<LEAVE> pairing
=back
for you automatically whenever it regains control after the callback
has terminated. This is done by simply not using the
- ENTER ;
- SAVETMPS ;
+ ENTER;
+ SAVETMPS;
...
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
sequence in the callback (and not, of course, specifying the G_DISCARD
flag).
those temporaries for you, you might be in for a long wait. For Perl
to dispose of your temporaries, control must drop back to the
enclosing scope at some stage. In the event driven scenario that may
-never happen. This means that as time goes on, your program will
+never happen. This means that, as time goes on, your program will
create more and more temporaries, none of which will ever be freed. As
each of these temporaries consumes some memory your program will
eventually consume all the available memory in your system--kapow!
uncertain about what to do, it doesn't do any harm to tidy up anyway.
-=head2 Strategies for storing Callback Context Information
+=head2 Strategies for Storing Callback Context Information
Potentially one of the trickiest problems to overcome when designing a
hypothetical function C<register_fatal> which registers the C function
to get called when a fatal error occurs.
- register_fatal(cb1) ;
+ register_fatal(cb1);
The single parameter C<cb1> is a pointer to a function, so you must
have defined C<cb1> in your code, say something like this
static void
cb1()
{
- printf ("Fatal Error\n") ;
- exit(1) ;
+ printf ("Fatal Error\n");
+ exit(1);
}
Now change that to call a Perl subroutine instead
static void
cb1()
{
- dSP ;
+ dSP;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
/* Call the Perl sub to process the callback */
- call_sv(callback, G_DISCARD) ;
+ call_sv(callback, G_DISCARD);
}
CODE:
/* Remember the Perl sub */
if (callback == (SV*)NULL)
- callback = newSVsv(fn) ;
+ callback = newSVsv(fn);
else
- SvSetSV(callback, fn) ;
+ SvSetSV(callback, fn);
/* register the callback with the external library */
- register_fatal(cb1) ;
+ register_fatal(cb1);
where the Perl equivalent of C<register_fatal> and the callback it
registers, C<pcb1>, might look like this
# Register the sub pcb1
- register_fatal(\&pcb1) ;
+ register_fatal(\&pcb1);
sub pcb1
{
- die "I'm dying...\n" ;
+ die "I'm dying...\n";
}
The mapping between the C callback and the Perl equivalent is stored in
void
ProcessRead(fh, buffer)
- int fh ;
- char * buffer ;
+ int fh;
+ char * buffer;
{
...
}
hash is a convenient mechanism for storing this mapping. The code
below shows a possible implementation
- static HV * Mapping = (HV*)NULL ;
+ static HV * Mapping = (HV*)NULL;
void
asynch_read(fh, callback)
CODE:
/* If the hash doesn't already exist, create it */
if (Mapping == (HV*)NULL)
- Mapping = newHV() ;
+ Mapping = newHV();
/* Save the fh -> callback mapping */
- hv_store(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), newSVsv(callback), 0) ;
+ hv_store(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), newSVsv(callback), 0);
/* Register with the C Library */
- asynch_read(fh, asynch_read_if) ;
+ asynch_read(fh, asynch_read_if);
and C<asynch_read_if> could look like this
static void
asynch_read_if(fh, buffer)
- int fh ;
- char * buffer ;
+ int fh;
+ char * buffer;
{
- dSP ;
- SV ** sv ;
+ dSP;
+ SV ** sv;
/* Get the callback associated with fh */
- sv = hv_fetch(Mapping, (char*)&fh , sizeof(fh), FALSE) ;
+ sv = hv_fetch(Mapping, (char*)&fh , sizeof(fh), FALSE);
if (sv == (SV**)NULL)
- croak("Internal error...\n") ;
+ croak("Internal error...\n");
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
- XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(fh))) ;
- XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0))) ;
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
+ XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(fh)));
+ XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0)));
+ PUTBACK;
/* Call the Perl sub */
- call_sv(*sv, G_DISCARD) ;
+ call_sv(*sv, G_DISCARD);
}
For completeness, here is C<asynch_close>. This shows how to remove
int fh
CODE:
/* Remove the entry from the hash */
- (void) hv_delete(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), G_DISCARD) ;
+ (void) hv_delete(Mapping, (char*)&fh, sizeof(fh), G_DISCARD);
/* Now call the real asynch_close */
- asynch_close(fh) ;
+ asynch_close(fh);
So the Perl interface would look like this
sub callback1
{
- my($handle, $buffer) = @_ ;
+ my($handle, $buffer) = @_;
}
# Register the Perl callback
- asynch_read($fh, \&callback1) ;
+ asynch_read($fh, \&callback1);
- asynch_close($fh) ;
+ asynch_close($fh);
The mapping between the C callback and Perl is stored in the global
hash C<Mapping> this time. Using a hash has the distinct advantage that
void
ProcessRead(buffer)
- char * buffer ;
+ char * buffer;
{
...
}
#define MAX_CB 3
#define NULL_HANDLE -1
- typedef void (*FnMap)() ;
+ typedef void (*FnMap)();
struct MapStruct {
- FnMap Function ;
- SV * PerlSub ;
- int Handle ;
- } ;
+ FnMap Function;
+ SV * PerlSub;
+ int Handle;
+ };
- static void fn1() ;
- static void fn2() ;
- static void fn3() ;
+ static void fn1();
+ static void fn2();
+ static void fn3();
static struct MapStruct Map [MAX_CB] =
{
{ fn1, NULL, NULL_HANDLE },
{ fn2, NULL, NULL_HANDLE },
{ fn3, NULL, NULL_HANDLE }
- } ;
+ };
static void
Pcb(index, buffer)
- int index ;
- char * buffer ;
+ int index;
+ char * buffer;
{
- dSP ;
+ dSP;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
- XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0))) ;
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
+ XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSVpv(buffer, 0)));
+ PUTBACK;
/* Call the Perl sub */
- call_sv(Map[index].PerlSub, G_DISCARD) ;
+ call_sv(Map[index].PerlSub, G_DISCARD);
}
static void
fn1(buffer)
- char * buffer ;
+ char * buffer;
{
- Pcb(0, buffer) ;
+ Pcb(0, buffer);
}
static void
fn2(buffer)
- char * buffer ;
+ char * buffer;
{
- Pcb(1, buffer) ;
+ Pcb(1, buffer);
}
static void
fn3(buffer)
- char * buffer ;
+ char * buffer;
{
- Pcb(2, buffer) ;
+ Pcb(2, buffer);
}
void
int fh
SV * callback
CODE:
- int index ;
- int null_index = MAX_CB ;
+ int index;
+ int null_index = MAX_CB;
/* Find the same handle or an empty entry */
- for (index = 0 ; index < MAX_CB ; ++index)
+ for (index = 0; index < MAX_CB; ++index)
{
if (Map[index].Handle == fh)
- break ;
+ break;
if (Map[index].Handle == NULL_HANDLE)
- null_index = index ;
+ null_index = index;
}
if (index == MAX_CB && null_index == MAX_CB)
- croak ("Too many callback functions registered\n") ;
+ croak ("Too many callback functions registered\n");
if (index == MAX_CB)
- index = null_index ;
+ index = null_index;
/* Save the file handle */
- Map[index].Handle = fh ;
+ Map[index].Handle = fh;
/* Remember the Perl sub */
if (Map[index].PerlSub == (SV*)NULL)
- Map[index].PerlSub = newSVsv(callback) ;
+ Map[index].PerlSub = newSVsv(callback);
else
- SvSetSV(Map[index].PerlSub, callback) ;
+ SvSetSV(Map[index].PerlSub, callback);
- asynch_read(fh, Map[index].Function) ;
+ asynch_read(fh, Map[index].Function);
void
array_asynch_close(fh)
int fh
CODE:
- int index ;
+ int index;
/* Find the file handle */
- for (index = 0; index < MAX_CB ; ++ index)
+ for (index = 0; index < MAX_CB; ++ index)
if (Map[index].Handle == fh)
- break ;
+ break;
if (index == MAX_CB)
- croak ("could not close fh %d\n", fh) ;
+ croak ("could not close fh %d\n", fh);
- Map[index].Handle = NULL_HANDLE ;
- SvREFCNT_dec(Map[index].PerlSub) ;
- Map[index].PerlSub = (SV*)NULL ;
+ Map[index].Handle = NULL_HANDLE;
+ SvREFCNT_dec(Map[index].PerlSub);
+ Map[index].PerlSub = (SV*)NULL;
- asynch_close(fh) ;
+ asynch_close(fh);
In this case the functions C<fn1>, C<fn2>, and C<fn3> are used to
remember the Perl subroutine to be called. Each of the functions holds
macros and read the stack using the C<ST> macro (See L<perlxs> for a
full description of the C<ST> macro).
-Most of the time the C<POP*> macros should be adequate, the main
+Most of the time the C<POP*> macros should be adequate; the main
problem with them is that they force you to process the returned values
in sequence. This may not be the most suitable way to process the
values in some cases. What we want is to be able to access the stack in
a random order. The C<ST> macro as used when coding an XSUB is ideal
for this purpose.
-The code below is the example given in the section I<Returning a list
-of
values> recoded to use C<ST> instead of C<POP*>.
+The code below is the example given in the section I<Returning a List
+of
Values> recoded to use C<ST> instead of C<POP*>.
static void
call_AddSubtract2(a, b)
- int a ;
- int b ;
+ int a;
+ int b;
{
- dSP ;
- I32 ax ;
- int count ;
+ dSP;
+ I32 ax;
+ int count;
- ENTER ;
+ ENTER;
SAVETMPS;
- PUSHMARK(SP) ;
+ PUSHMARK(SP);
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(a)));
XPUSHs(sv_2mortal(newSViv(b)));
- PUTBACK ;
+ PUTBACK;
count = call_pv("AddSubtract", G_ARRAY);
- SPAGAIN ;
- SP -= count ;
- ax = (SP - PL_stack_base) + 1 ;
+ SPAGAIN;
+ SP -= count;
+ ax = (SP - PL_stack_base) + 1;
if (count != 2)
- croak("Big trouble\n") ;
+ croak("Big trouble\n");
- printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(0))) ;
- printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(1))) ;
+ printf ("%d + %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(0)));
+ printf ("%d - %d = %d\n", a, b, SvIV(ST(1)));
- PUTBACK ;
- FREETMPS ;
- LEAVE ;
+ PUTBACK;
+ FREETMPS;
+ LEAVE;
}
Notes
Notice that it was necessary to define the variable C<ax>. This is
because the C<ST> macro expects it to exist. If we were in an XSUB it
would not be necessary to define C<ax> as it is already defined for
-you.
+us.
=item 2.
The code
- SPAGAIN ;
- SP -= count ;
- ax = (SP - PL_stack_base) + 1 ;
+ SPAGAIN;
+ SP -= count;
+ ax = (SP - PL_stack_base) + 1;
sets the stack up so that we can use the C<ST> macro.
=back
-=head2 Creating and calling an anonymous subroutine in C
+=head2 Creating and Calling an Anonymous Subroutine in C
As we've already shown, C<call_sv> can be used to invoke an
anonymous subroutine. However, our example showed a Perl script
created and destroyed once, and the sub can be called
arbitrarily many times in between.
-It is usual to pass parameters using global variables -- typically
-$_ for one parameter, or $a and $b for two parameters -- rather
+It is usual to pass parameters using global variables (typically
+$_ for one parameter, or $a and $b for two parameters) rather
than via @_. (It is possible to use the @_ mechanism if you know
what you're doing, though there is as yet no supported API for
it. It's also inherently slower.)
dMULTICALL; /* Declare local variables */
I32 gimme = G_SCALAR; /* context of the call: G_SCALAR,
- * G_LIST, or G_VOID */
+ * G_ARRAY, or G_VOID */
PUSH_MULTICALL(cv); /* Set up the context for calling cv,
and set local vars appropriately */
https://perl5.git.perl.org / perl5.git / blobdiff