Choose an appropriate name
+=item *
+
+Get feedback before publishing
+
=back
=head2 The API
good reason.
Good places to look for pre-existing modules include
-http://search.cpan.org/ and asking on modules@perl.org
+L<http://search.cpan.org/> and L<https://metacpan.org>
+and asking on C<module-authors@perl.org>
+(L<http://lists.perl.org/list/module-authors.html>).
If an existing module B<almost> does what you want, consider writing a
patch, writing a subclass, or otherwise extending the existing module
=back
-You should contact modules@perl.org to ask them about your module name
-before publishing your module. You should also try to ask people who
-are already familiar with the module's application domain and the CPAN
-naming system. Authors of similar modules, or modules with similar
-names, may be a good place to start.
+=head2 Get feedback before publishing
+
+If you have never uploaded a module to CPAN before (and even if you have),
+you are strongly encouraged to get feedback on L<PrePAN|http://prepan.org>.
+PrePAN is a site dedicated to discussing ideas for CPAN modules with other
+Perl developers and is a great resource for new (and experienced) Perl
+developers.
+
+You should also try to get feedback from people who are already familiar
+with the module's application domain and the CPAN naming system. Authors
+of similar modules, or modules with similar names, may be a good place to
+start, as are community sites like L<Perl Monks|http://www.perlmonks.org>.
=head1 DESIGNING AND WRITING YOUR MODULE
=item Parameter passing
-Use named parameters. It's easier to use a hash like this:
+Use named parameters. It's easier to use a hash like this:
$obj->do_something(
name => "wibble",
giving pointers to further information (website, author email).
An INSTALL file should be included, and should contain simple installation
-instructions. When using ExtUtils::MakeMaker this will usually be:
+instructions. When using ExtUtils::MakeMaker this will usually be:
=over 4
1.00, 1.10, 1.11, 1.20, 1.30, 1.31, 1.32
A correct CPAN version number is a floating point number with at least
-2 digits after the decimal. You can test whether it conforms to CPAN by
+2 digits after the decimal. You can test whether it conforms to CPAN by
using
perl -MExtUtils::MakeMaker -le 'print MM->parse_version(shift)' 'Foo.pm'
If you want to release a 'beta' or 'alpha' version of a module but
don't want CPAN.pm to list it as most recent use an '_' after the
-regular version number followed by at least 2 digits, eg. 1.20_01. If
+regular version number followed by at least 2 digits, eg. 1.20_01. If
you do this, the following idiom is recommended:
- our $VERSION = "1.12_01"; # so CPAN distribution will have right filename
+ our $VERSION = "1.12_01"; # so CPAN distribution will have
+ # right filename
our $XS_VERSION = $VERSION; # only needed if you have XS code
- $VERSION = eval $VERSION; # so "use Module 0.002" won't warn on underscore
+ $VERSION = eval $VERSION; # so "use Module 0.002" won't warn on
+ # underscore
With that trick MakeMaker will only read the first line and thus read
the underscore, while the perl interpreter will evaluate the $VERSION
-and convert the string into a number. Later operations that treat
+and convert the string into a number. Later operations that treat
$VERSION as a number will then be able to do so without provoking a
warning about $VERSION not being a number.
result in a change in version at the sub-minor level.
Once picked, it is important to stick to your version scheme, without
-reducing the number of digits. This is because "downstream" packagers,
+reducing the number of digits. This is because "downstream" packagers,
such as the FreeBSD ports system, interpret the version numbers in
-various ways. If you change the number of digits in your version scheme,
+various ways. If you change the number of digits in your version scheme,
you can confuse these systems so they get the versions of your module
out of order, which is obviously bad.
pre-requisites in your Makefile.PL or Build.PL.
Be sure to specify Perl version requirements both in Makefile.PL or
-Build.PL and with C<require 5.6.1> or similar. See the section on
+Build.PL and with C<require 5.6.1> or similar. See the section on
C<use VERSION> of L<perlfunc/require> for details.
=head2 Testing
For Module::Build you would use the C<make test> equivalent C<perl Build test>.
The importance of these tests is proportional to the alleged stability of a
-module. A module which purports to be stable or which hopes to achieve wide
+module. A module which purports to be
+stable or which hopes to achieve wide
use should adhere to as strict a testing regime as possible.
Useful modules to help you write tests (with minimum impact on your
more platform independent Module::Build, allowing modules to be installed in a
consistent manner.
When using ExtUtils::MakeMaker, you can use "make dist" to create your
-package. Tools exist to help you to build your module in a MakeMaker-friendly
-style. These include ExtUtils::ModuleMaker and h2xs. See also L<perlnewmod>.
+package. Tools exist to help you to build your module in a
+MakeMaker-friendly style. These include ExtUtils::ModuleMaker and h2xs.
+See also L<perlnewmod>.
=head2 Licensing
https://perl5.git.perl.org / perl5.git / blobdiff