http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/
-The list is also archived under the usenet group name
-C<perl.porters-gw> at:
-
- http://www.deja.com/
-
List subscribers (the porters themselves) come in several flavours.
Some are quiet curious lurkers, who rarely pitch in and instead watch
the ongoing development to ensure they're forewarned of new changes or
tests to make sure our patch works and doesn't create a bug somewhere
else along the line.
-The regression tests for each operator live in F<t/op/>, and so we make
-a copy of F<t/op/pack.t> to F<t/op/pack.t~>. Now we can add our tests
-to the end. First, we'll test that the C<U> does indeed create Unicode
-strings:
+The regression tests for each operator live in F<t/op/>, and so we
+make a copy of F<t/op/pack.t> to F<t/op/pack.t~>. Now we can add our
+tests to the end. First, we'll test that the C<U> does indeed create
+Unicode strings.
+
+t/op/pack.t has a sensible ok() function, but if it didn't we could
+write one easily.
+
+ my $test = 1;
+ sub ok {
+ my($ok, $name) = @_;
+
+ # You have to do it this way or VMS will get confused.
+ print $ok ? "ok $test - $name\n" : "not ok $test - $name\n";
+
+ printf "# Failed test at line %d\n", (caller)[2] unless $ok;
+
+ $test++;
+ return $ok;
+ }
+
+so instead of this:
print 'not ' unless "1.20.300.4000" eq sprintf "%vd", pack("U*",1,20,300,4000);
print "ok $test\n"; $test++;
+we can write the (somewhat) more sensible:
+
+ ok( "1.20.300.4000" eq sprintf "%vd", pack("U*",1,20,300,4000),
+ "U* produces unicode" );
+
Now we'll test that we got that space-at-the-beginning business right:
- print 'not ' unless "1.20.300.4000" eq
- sprintf "%vd", pack(" U*",1,20,300,4000);
- print "ok $test\n"; $test++;
+ ok( "1.20.300.4000" eq sprintf "%vd", pack(" U*",1,20,300,4000),
+ " with spaces at the beginning" );
And finally we'll test that we don't make Unicode strings if C<U> is B<not>
the first active format:
- print 'not ' unless v1.20.300.4000 ne
- sprintf "%vd", pack("C0U*",1,20,300,4000);
- print "ok $test\n"; $test++;
+ ok( v1.20.300.4000 ne sprintf "%vd", pack("C0U*",1,20,300,4000),
+ "U* not first isn't unicode" );
Mustn't forget to change the number of tests which appears at the top, or
else the automated tester will get confused:
maintainer keep the CPAN version in sync with the core version without
constantly scanning p5p.
+=head2 Adding a new function to the core
+
+If, as part of a patch to fix a bug, or just because you have an
+especially good idea, you decide to add a new function to the core,
+discuss your ideas on p5p well before you start work. It may be that
+someone else has already attempted to do what you are considering and
+can give lots of good advice or even provide you with bits of code
+that they already started (but never finished).
+
+You have to follow all of the advice given above for patching. It is
+extremely important to test any addition thoroughly and add new tests
+to explore all boundary conditions that your new function is expected
+to handle. If your new function is used only by one module (e.g. toke),
+then it should probably be named S_your_function (for static); on the
+other hand, if you expect it to accessable from other functions in
+Perl, you should name it Perl_your_function. See L<perlguts/Internal Functions>
+for more details.
+
+The location of any new code is also an important consideration. Don't
+just create a new top level .c file and put your code there; you would
+have to make changes to Configure (so the Makefile is created properly),
+as well as possibly lots of include files. This is strictly pumpking
+business.
+
+It is better to add your function to one of the existing top level
+source code files, but your choice is complicated by the nature of
+the Perl distribution. Only the files that are marked as compiled
+static are located in the perl executable. Everything else is located
+in the shared library (or DLL if you are running under WIN32). So,
+for example, if a function was only used by functions located in
+toke.c, then your code can go in toke.c. If, however, you want to call
+the function from universal.c, then you should put your code in another
+location, for example util.c.
+
+In addition to writing your c-code, you will need to create an
+appropriate entry in embed.pl describing your function, then run
+'make regen_headers' to create the entries in the numerous header
+files that perl needs to compile correctly. See L<perlguts/Internal Functions>
+for information on the various options that you can set in embed.pl.
+You will forget to do this a few (or many) times and you will get
+warnings during the compilation phase. Make sure that you mention
+this when you post your patch to P5P; the pumpking needs to know this.
+
+When you write your new code, please be conscious of existing code
+conventions used in the perl source files. See <perlstyle> for
+details. Although most of the guidelines discussed seem to focus on
+Perl code, rather than c, they all apply (except when they don't ;).
+See also I<Porting/patching.pod> file in the Perl source distribution
+for lots of details about both formatting and submitting patches of
+your changes.
+
+Lastly, TEST TEST TEST TEST TEST any code before posting to p5p.
+Test on as many platforms as you can find. Test as many perl
+Configure options as you can (e.g. MULTIPLICITY). If you have
+profiling or memory tools, see L<EXTERNAL TOOLS FOR DEBUGGING PERL>
+below for how to use them to futher test your code. Remember that
+most of the people on P5P are doing this on their own time and
+don't have the time to debug your code.
=head2 Writing a test
https://perl5.git.perl.org / perl5.git / blobdiff