This had a plain '=' instead of an '==', thus setting the value in the
process of asserting it, hence would always be true. But changing it to
'==' causes the assertion to fail in various cases.
I need to rethink this, so in the meantime am simply removing it.
Spotted by Dave Mitchell++
goto redo_parse;
}
- /* In a stable state, as here, this must be true */
- assert(RExC_size = RExC_emit + 1);
-
/* Here, we have successfully parsed and generated the pattern's program
* for the regex engine. We are ready to finish things up and look for
* optimizations. */