This is a live mirror of the Perl 5 development currently hosted at https://github.com/perl/perl5
perl 5.002gamma: mg.c
authorPerl 5 Porters <perl5-porters@africa.nicoh.com>
Sat, 3 Feb 1996 17:43:39 +0000 (12:43 -0500)
committerAndy Dougherty <doughera@lafcol.lafayette.edu>
Sat, 3 Feb 1996 17:43:39 +0000 (12:43 -0500)
commitc6496cc7fc2c48aca71f04ae322477979e67d744
tree1fbd1e1ca1650a5504b0c54b9601b3e88f420e9b
parent01e8c204017179e3fa6cbc2de78a2b253e247445
perl 5.002gamma: mg.c

>From salzench@dun.nielsen.comSat Feb  3 15:17:03 1996
>Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 12:43:39 -0500 (EST)
>From: Chip Salzenberg <salzench@dun.nielsen.com>
>Reply to: chip@atlantic.net
>To: Perl 5 Porters <perl5-porters@africa.nicoh.com>
>Subject: Beta3: Possible typo in sv_unmagic() [edited]

>From salzench@dun.nielsen.comTue Feb  6 09:45:25 1996
>Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 00:09:09 -0500 (EST)
>From: Chip Salzenberg <salzench@dun.nielsen.com>
>Reply to: chip@atlantic.net
>To: Perl 5 Porters <perl5-porters@africa.nicoh.com>
>Subject: Beta3: Fix for 2nd magic SEGV

>From lwall@sems.comWed Feb  7 09:10:55 1996
>Date: Tue, 06 Feb 96 14:52:41 -0800
>From: Larry Wall <lwall@sems.com>
>To: perl5-porters@africa.nicoh.com
>Subject: study still busted

>The study itself work fine, but if you modify the string, it still thinks
>it is studied.  In some ways this is worse than study not working at all,
>as it did (or rather didn't) before.  Here's the test case:
mg.c