Commit | Line | Data |
---|---|---|
a0d0e21e LW |
1 | =head1 NAME |
2 | ||
3 | perlsec - Perl security | |
4 | ||
5 | =head1 DESCRIPTION | |
6 | ||
7 | Perl is designed to make it easy to write secure setuid and setgid | |
8 | scripts. Unlike shells, which are based on multiple substitution | |
9 | passes on each line of the script, Perl uses a more conventional | |
10 | evaluation scheme with fewer hidden "gotchas". Additionally, since the | |
11 | language has more built-in functionality, it has to rely less upon | |
12 | external (and possibly untrustworthy) programs to accomplish its | |
13 | purposes. | |
14 | ||
15 | Beyond the obvious problems that stem from giving special privileges to | |
16 | such flexible systems as scripts, on many operating systems, setuid | |
17 | scripts are inherently insecure right from the start. This is because | |
18 | that between the time that the kernel opens up the file to see what to | |
19 | run, and when the now setuid interpreter it ran turns around and reopens | |
20 | the file so it can interpret it, things may have changed, especially if | |
21 | you have symbolic links on your system. | |
22 | ||
23 | Fortunately, sometimes this kernel "feature" can be disabled. | |
24 | Unfortunately, there are two ways to disable it. The system can simply | |
25 | outlaw scripts with the setuid bit set, which doesn't help much. | |
26 | Alternately, it can simply ignore the setuid bit on scripts. If the | |
27 | latter is true, Perl can emulate the setuid and setgid mechanism when it | |
28 | notices the otherwise useless setuid/gid bits on Perl scripts. It does | |
29 | this via a special executable called B<suidperl> that is automatically | |
30 | invoked for you if it's needed. | |
31 | ||
32 | If, however, the kernel setuid script feature isn't disabled, Perl will | |
33 | complain loudly that your setuid script is insecure. You'll need to | |
34 | either disable the kernel setuid script feature, or put a C wrapper around | |
35 | the script. See the program B<wrapsuid> in the F<eg> directory of your | |
36 | Perl distribution for how to go about doing this. | |
37 | ||
38 | There are some systems on which setuid scripts are free of this inherent | |
39 | security bug. For example, recent releases of Solaris are like this. On | |
40 | such systems, when the kernel passes the name of the setuid script to open | |
41 | to the interpreter, rather than using a pathname subject to mettling, it | |
42 | instead passes /dev/fd/3. This is a special file already opened on the | |
43 | script, so that there can be no race condition for evil scripts to | |
44 | exploit. On these systems, Perl should be compiled with | |
45 | C<-DSETUID_SCRIPTS_ARE_SECURE_NOW>. The B<Configure> program that builds | |
46 | Perl tries to figure this out for itself. | |
47 | ||
48 | When Perl is executing a setuid script, it takes special precautions to | |
49 | prevent you from falling into any obvious traps. (In some ways, a Perl | |
50 | script is more secure than the corresponding C program.) Any command line | |
51 | argument, environment variable, or input is marked as "tainted", and may | |
52 | not be used, directly or indirectly, in any command that invokes a | |
53 | subshell, or in any command that modifies files, directories, or | |
54 | processes. Any variable that is set within an expression that has | |
55 | previously referenced a tainted value also becomes tainted (even if it is | |
56 | logically impossible for the tainted value to influence the variable). | |
57 | For example: | |
58 | ||
59 | $foo = shift; # $foo is tainted | |
60 | $bar = $foo,'bar'; # $bar is also tainted | |
61 | $xxx = <>; # Tainted | |
62 | $path = $ENV{'PATH'}; # Tainted, but see below | |
63 | $abc = 'abc'; # Not tainted | |
64 | ||
65 | system "echo $foo"; # Insecure | |
66 | system "/bin/echo", $foo; # Secure (doesn't use sh) | |
67 | system "echo $bar"; # Insecure | |
68 | system "echo $abc"; # Insecure until PATH set | |
69 | ||
70 | $ENV{'PATH'} = '/bin:/usr/bin'; | |
71 | $ENV{'IFS'} = '' if $ENV{'IFS'} ne ''; | |
72 | ||
73 | $path = $ENV{'PATH'}; # Not tainted | |
74 | system "echo $abc"; # Is secure now! | |
75 | ||
76 | open(FOO,"$foo"); # OK | |
77 | open(FOO,">$foo"); # Not OK | |
78 | ||
79 | open(FOO,"echo $foo|"); # Not OK, but... | |
80 | open(FOO,"-|") || exec 'echo', $foo; # OK | |
81 | ||
82 | $zzz = `echo $foo`; # Insecure, zzz tainted | |
83 | ||
84 | unlink $abc,$foo; # Insecure | |
85 | umask $foo; # Insecure | |
86 | ||
87 | exec "echo $foo"; # Insecure | |
88 | exec "echo", $foo; # Secure (doesn't use sh) | |
89 | exec "sh", '-c', $foo; # Considered secure, alas | |
90 | ||
91 | The taintedness is associated with each scalar value, so some elements | |
92 | of an array can be tainted, and others not. | |
93 | ||
94 | If you try to do something insecure, you will get a fatal error saying | |
95 | something like "Insecure dependency" or "Insecure PATH". Note that you | |
96 | can still write an insecure system call or exec, but only by explicitly | |
97 | doing something like the last example above. You can also bypass the | |
98 | tainting mechanism by referencing subpatterns--Perl presumes that if | |
99 | you reference a substring using $1, $2, etc, you knew what you were | |
100 | doing when you wrote the pattern: | |
101 | ||
102 | $ARGV[0] =~ /^-P(\w+)$/; | |
103 | $printer = $1; # Not tainted | |
104 | ||
105 | This is fairly secure since C<\w+> doesn't match shell metacharacters. | |
106 | Use of C</.+/> would have been insecure, but Perl doesn't check for that, | |
107 | so you must be careful with your patterns. This is the I<ONLY> mechanism | |
108 | for untainting user supplied filenames if you want to do file operations | |
109 | on them (unless you make C<$E<gt>> equal to C<$E<lt>> ). | |
110 | ||
111 | For "Insecure PATH" messages, you need to set C<$ENV{'PATH}'> to a known | |
112 | value, and each directory in the path must be non-writable by the world. | |
113 | A frequently voiced gripe is that you can get this message even | |
114 | if the pathname to an executable is fully qualified. But Perl can't | |
115 | know that the executable in question isn't going to execute some other | |
116 | program depending on the PATH. | |
117 | ||
118 | It's also possible to get into trouble with other operations that don't | |
119 | care whether they use tainted values. Make judicious use of the file | |
120 | tests in dealing with any user-supplied filenames. When possible, do | |
121 | opens and such after setting C<$E<gt> = $E<lt>>. (Remember group IDs, | |
122 | too!) Perl doesn't prevent you from opening tainted filenames for reading, | |
123 | so be careful what you print out. The tainting mechanism is intended to | |
124 | prevent stupid mistakes, not to remove the need for thought. | |
125 |