remove misleading comment about CXINC; it's fine
authorChip Salzenberg <chip@pobox.com>
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:42:49 +0000 (23:42 -0700)
committerChip Salzenberg <chip@pobox.com>
Wed, 28 Jul 2010 06:42:49 +0000 (23:42 -0700)
scope.c

diff --git a/scope.c b/scope.c
index 92e9523..5445da9 100644 (file)
--- a/scope.c
+++ b/scope.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Perl_cxinc(pTHX)
     dVAR;
     const IV old_max = cxstack_max;
     cxstack_max = GROW(cxstack_max);
-    Renew(cxstack, cxstack_max + 1, PERL_CONTEXT);     /* XXX should fix CXINC macro */
+    Renew(cxstack, cxstack_max + 1, PERL_CONTEXT);
     /* Without any kind of initialising deep enough recursion
      * will end up reading uninitialised PERL_CONTEXTs. */
     PoisonNew(cxstack + old_max + 1, cxstack_max - old_max, PERL_CONTEXT);